1996: THE YEAR IN REVIEW

Our U.S. community: activity on the wane?


With all due respect, our community life in the United States seemed to be on the wane in 1996. There seemed to be few things that got the whole community truly involved or excited, and, when there was activity, for the most part it seemed to be more of the same (or should we say less of the same ...) To be sure, there were the solemn 10th anniversary commemorations of the Chornobyl nuclear accident (see section titled "Chornobyl: 10 years after") and there were myriad events marking the joyous fifth anniversary of Ukraine's independence, but, by and large it seemed our community was somewhat disjointed, suffering still from the disunity that has characterized our community life for 16 years now, and the disorientation that came in the wake of Ukraine's independence as our community here seeks to redefine its role.

The major community event marking the fifth anniversary of Ukraine's independence proclamation took place on Capitol Hill on September 18. The luncheon reception, held in the Russell Senate Office Building with more than 250 persons in attendance, was sponsored by the Ukrainian American Coordinating Council and the Ukrainian Congress Committee of America, and Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.), as well as some 30 other members of the Senate and House of Representatives. The keynote speaker was Volodymyr Horbulin, secretary of the National Security Council of Ukraine, who was then in Washington for four days of talks with Clinton administration officials. Mr. Horbulin expressed his gratitude and that of President Leonid Kuchma to Ukrainian Americans "who never lost the dream of an independent Ukaine" and continued working on its behalf after the advent of independence.

Other speakers included: Sens. Levin, Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), Frank Lautenberg (D-N.J.), Paul Sarbanes (D-Md.) and Reps. Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) and Benjamin Gilman (R-N.Y.), as well as Melanne Verveer, deputy assistant to President Bill Clinton and deputy chief of staff to the first lady, who greeted her fellow Ukrainian Americans on behalf of the Clinton administration.`

And, of course, since it was a presidential election year, Ukrainian Americans got involved in the campaign both on the Democratic and the Republican sides (at times, as seen on the pages of this newspaper, the debate between supporters of Bill Clinton on one side and supporters of Bob Dole on the other got quite heated). As Election Day approached, the Ukrainian National Information Service, the Washington Bureau of the Ukrainian Congress Committee of America, released the presidential campaigns' answers to a questionnaire it had prepared on behalf of the Ukrainian American community. The questionnaire covered five major points of interest: U.S. foreign assistance to Ukraine, the work of the U.S. Agency for International Development, Russian foreign policy and aggression, security guarantees for Ukraine, and consequences of the Chornobyl nuclear accident. The responses were published in the October 13 issue of The Weekly.

Two weeks after that, the paper published a "Congressional Scorecard," a rating of congressional candidates on both sides of the political aisle and where they stood on issues relating to Ukraine and U.S.-Ukrainian relations. The scorecard, compiled by the Washington representatives of the Ukrainian National Association and the Ukrainian Congress Committee of America, listed those among the candidates for 34 Senate seats and all 435 seats in the House who were considered supportive of Ukrainian issues as well as those who were deemed unresponsive to the Ukrainian American community's concerns.

The fact that 1996 was an election year was evident also at many community gatherings, including conferences like the annual Leadership Conference organized by The Washington Group (see below) and the Congress of Ukrainians in America, the quadrennial convention of the UCCA, held on October 18-20 in East Hanover, N.J.

The UCCA honored President Clinton with the Shevchenko Freedom Award for his "commitment to pursing steadfast relations with Ukraine and the recognition of Ukraine's vital importance in the continued peace and security of the European continent" and for his "keen understanding and close working relationship with the Ukrainian American community." The award was accepted on President Clinton's behalf by Ambassador Madeleine Albright, U.S. permanent representative to the United Nations (who has since been nominated by President Clinton to serve as U.S. secretary of state during his second term). Ambassador Albright spoke of the significance of the growing relationship between the United States and Ukraine, and noted that "The administration envisions an undivided Europe that is increasingly stable, secure, prosperous and democratic ... If this vision of Europe is to become a reality, Ukraine - because of its size, its location, its resources and the abilities of its people - must play an integral role."

Other recipients of the 1996 Shevchenko Freedom Awards were Sen. McConnell, Reps. Gilman, Sander Levin and David Bonior, as well as Hennadii Udovenko, foreign affairs minister of Ukraine and long-time permanent representative of Ukraine to the United Nations.

The Dole campaign was represented at the UCCA conclave by Edward Derwinski, former congressman and former secretary for veterans' affairs. Mr. Derwinski underscored the importance of familiarizing the Western world with Ukraine.

The UCCA congress also elected new governing bodies, and Askold Lozynskyj was re-elected president for a second term.

The other Ukrainian central organization in the United States, the Ukrainian American Coordinating Council, whose president is Ulana Diachuk, continued its organizational work in 1996. It had hoped for a congress of reunification to occur in October of this year at the time the UCCA held its regularly scheduled congress, but apparently that was not to be. The UACC's next congress, meanwhile, is slated to take place next year in September - unless, of course, an agreement on forming one central organization is reached before then.

Other major community developments during 1996 included the following.

* * *

Last year we closed this section wondering: What will 1996 bring for the Ukrainian American community? Will it be a renewed unity, or continued squabbling? Will there be a refocusing on our priorities in this country, or will we continue to set our sights on Ukraine, often to the detriment of our community life here? The same questions could be posed again this year.

But, in all fairness, it should be noted that there is at least a glimmer of hope for unity. Since April, tripartite negotiations have been going on in an effort to reunite the Ukrainian American community into one central organization, and representatives of the Ukrainian Congress Committee of America, the Ukrainian American Coordinating Council and the Conference of Non-Aligned Organizations are moving toward a resolution of the divisiveness that has existed since 1980. There has been some progress, as well as some setbacks, but in the end it seems the right intentions are there: all three parties want unity and would like to reunite into a new body called the Ukrainian Congress of America. Hopefully, a congress of reunification will take place in 1997.


Copyright © The Ukrainian Weekly, December 29, 1996, No. 52, Vol. LXIV


| Home Page |